review structure
distracted? yup i do
so now, perhaps it is the time to write down the structure of the review of references
1. complexity science and modelling
2. complexity in architecture: the common believes
a. Robert Venturi
the classic view of complexity
b. Charles Jencks
people has rubbishing his idea, i personally won't pursue the same path, but things should be honestly been cleared. all only because there exists a branch of architecture dealing specifically to model architecture's complex phenomena
c. Greg Lynn
3. the configurational theory of architecture
4. the old period (automating layout programs: galle's analysis revived)
5. the field of computational geometry
so now, perhaps it is the time to write down the structure of the review of references
1. complexity science and modelling
2. complexity in architecture: the common believes
a. Robert Venturi
the classic view of complexity
b. Charles Jencks
people has rubbishing his idea, i personally won't pursue the same path, but things should be honestly been cleared. all only because there exists a branch of architecture dealing specifically to model architecture's complex phenomena
c. Greg Lynn
3. the configurational theory of architecture
4. the old period (automating layout programs: galle's analysis revived)
5. the field of computational geometry
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home