ref structure :: again

1. complexity science and modelling
a. Cilliers book
b. Holland book

2. complexity in architecture: the common beliefs
a. Robert Venturi book
the classic view of complexity
b. Charles Jencks book, articles
c. Greg Lynn book
?. eisenmann?

3. the configurational theory of architecture

4. automating layout design
a. galle review 1986
b. bijl 1968

5. agents
a. boids individual-based models
b. karl sims
c. bonabeau stigmergy
?. ghersenson

6. voronoi, within the field of computational geometry
spatially concern methods???
a. adamatzky

key refs

1. automating layout
P galle abstraction as a tool of automated floor plan design

2. agents
c reynolds individual-based models

3. voronoi
adamatzky

* * *

belated happy birthday

23 may 1945!

belated happy birthday p, can't reach your mobile, you must be in milan atm!
no wishes since you never like them.

Volendam 2003 

review structure

distracted? yup i do

so now, perhaps it is the time to write down the structure of the review of references

1. complexity science and modelling

2. complexity in architecture: the common believes
a. Robert Venturi
the classic view of complexity
b. Charles Jencks
people has rubbishing his idea, i personally won't pursue the same path, but things should be honestly been cleared. all only because there exists a branch of architecture dealing specifically to model architecture's complex phenomena
c. Greg Lynn

3. the configurational theory of architecture

4. the old period (automating layout programs: galle's analysis revived)

5. the field of computational geometry